Inaccurate Scales: A Weighty Problem For The Quantified Executive

A Range of Scales

“I always say you shouldn’t weigh yourself. I don’t even have a set of scales in my house.”Kim Kardashian

Well, until yesterday, I didn’t have a “set of scales” in my house either. But, as you can see, I do now. Wondering why?

A Change in Lifestyle

In my quest to become a healthier, fit person, I have adopted the lifestyle of the healthier, fit person I want to become. For me, technology has been a magical key that has unlocked the secret to that lifestyle. The benefits have been weight loss, extra energy, a sense of well being and – as my daughter Alexis describes it – “charming Shelly,” as opposed to the grumpy, cynical, curmudgeonly Shelly from days of old.

The good news is that my “behave like the person you want to be” philosophy does not require me to ever step on a scale. My weight loss (approximately 26 pounds so far) is a result of how I have chosen to live, eat and exercise. I’ll stop losing weight when my body reaches the weight it wants to be. However…

The Quantified Executive

I’m a huge geek (well, slightly less huge than I used to be), but a geek nonetheless. And, like I said, the key to my lifestyle change has been technology. Some people call it the “Quantified Self” movement; I’m calling it, “The Quantified Executive.” No matter what you call it, here is how it works.

3,500 calories = 1 pound. Eat 3,500 calories more than you burn, you will gain a pound. Eat 3,500 calories less than you burn and you will lose a pound. The math is inviolate.

To make this equation actionable, you need accurate measurement tools. For me, the routine is easy. I enter every single morsel of food I consume into the MyFitnessPal app on my smartphone. This gives me the best approximation of the amount of calories I consume.

I wear a Jawbone UP bracelet and I use two apps with it: the UP app, which measures my approximate calories burned from walking (and which also gives its own version of interesting, but less useful, sleep tracking). And I use RunKeeper to track my daily walks.

Using just these three apps, I’ve been able to quantify my behaviors – and, much more importantly, adapt my behaviors to my benefit. As a Quantified Executive, I know the power of data – and so do you.

Therein Lies the Rub

Which brings me to my “set of scales” problem. Part of the process of quantification is tracking results. I know that the calorie/weight equation is correct, but there are several variables in my process. Some days I eat bigger lunches or have to eat at a restaurant. The difference between the amounts of oil in two tablespoons of homemade salad dressing vs. restaurant salad dressing can be enormous. If you’re trying to limit your caloric intake to 1,500/day, a wrong move or brain fade can cost you close to 10 percent of those calories (yes, in just two tablespoons of dressing).

My progress tracking method of choice has been the Withings WS-50 digital scale. It reports my weight to my smartphone and generates a bunch of less useful data like heart rate, estimated BMI and air quality. Having a digital scale that you can trust is great. I get on the scale every morning (when I’m home) and the app and associated website create a digital record of each event. Over time, a delightful graph is generated which illustrates my progress.

Now, one of the big problems facing the quantified self movement is that very few apps and devices speak the same language. There are no industry standards for measurement or easy ways to see all of your various activities tracked against each other. The answer, for me, and everyone else who is trying to quantify their lives, is Excel. I’ve created a spreadsheet that takes my caloric intake from MyFitnessPal, my estimated calories burned from UP, and my weight from my Withings WS-50 scale. I use the spreadsheet to track (and project) my progress.

Mixed Results

In order to keep the data on this spreadsheet as meaningful as possible, I need accurate weight measurements daily. I encountered one minor problem – that I spend my weekends in CT and my weekdays in NYC – but that has a simple answer: I purchased an additional Withings scale for CT. In this case, I purchased the WS-30, because the “extra” measurements available on the WS-50 are meaningless.

I was so excited (relatively speaking) by the prospect of weighing myself every day. That excitement didn’t last long.

The first time I used the WS-30, the readings were about 1.3 pounds different from the previous day’s readings taken by the Withings WS-50 and, sadly, had nothing to do with the old-fashioned digital scale that was already in the bathroom in CT.

To confirm my technology problem, I brought my WS-50 up from NYC so I could do a “three scale” showdown a few seconds apart. The results made me very sad:

  • 224.2 – Withings WS-50
  • 224.9 – Old-fashioned digital scale
  • 225.7 – Withings WS-30

Now it’s the end of August, and I’m down somewhere around 26 pounds since the beginning of May, so I can’t really complain, but…  a 1.3 pound differential in a world where I’m tracking and projecting .25, .33 and .50 pound per day reductions in weight, with a goal of 2 pounds per week (7,000 more calories burned than consumed), this kind of discrepancy is unacceptable in the extreme!

Is there a solution? Sure: just use one scale that you don’t move and only weigh yourself once or twice per week. But, at least in the case of these two Withings scales – accuracy (or being calibrated to display the same weight regardless of actual accuracy) is not possible.

So, Quantified Executives beware – un-calibrated, inaccurate measurement technology, that is not designed to mix and match can be your undoing. (Did I hear someone say Nielsen, Arbitron, Rentrak, Google Analytics, Omniture, ComScore, etc… oops!) It’s a weighty problem indeed.

Share/Bookmark

Author:

Shelly Palmer

Shelly Palmer is Fox 5 New York's On-air Tech Expert (WNYW-TV) and the host of Fox Television's monthly show Shelly Palmer Digital Living. He also hosts United Stations Radio Network's, Shelly Palmer Digital Living Daily, a daily syndicated radio report that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and a member of the Executive Committee of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards).

Comments

  1. MikeC says:

    That’s very inspiring, Shelly. My office set up a Weight Watchers group back in March, and that helped me drop about 24 pounds in about 16 weeks. But then when the group stopped meeting in the office, I’ve continued to use the eTools on their Web site and the WW Mobile app on my smart phone. I’m now down over 30 pounds. I occasionally use the scanner app that they offer as well, which lets you scan in the bar code of an item you’re thinking of buying in the supermarket, or that you already have in the fridge, and it will tell you how many points it is with Weight Watchers. I recently deleted it, though, because I wasn’t using it much. I’ve also used a movement-tracking app, Moves, which was informative, telling me how many steps I had taken the previous day and the previous week, and when I set a new record for myself. Unfortunately the battery life on my phone was getting drained by the end of the day so I deleted that and RunKeeper, which I never got around to setting up properly, a few days ago. I might go back to using them, but right now all I’ve got is WW Mobile on the phone.

  2. Ted Dunning says:

    Shelly,

    Just bring the two scales to the same place for a week or two and record weights from both. Do it at different times of the day and do it with a small weight of a few pounds in your hands so that you get some variety in the values.

    After you have a few dozen readings, you should be able to build a pretty good calibration for the two. Even excel can be use for this by doing a linear regression on the matched measurements. That linear regression can be used to calibrate one scale into the measurements made by the other.

    • Shelly says:

      Ted – I’m already on it. I took the 5lb weights I used to walk with to get a variety of values and I’ve spend the last couple of days building up enough data points to regress. Great minds think alike. Thanks for your comment — I appreciate your thoughts and your validation of my methodology.

  3. Bob T says:

    Based on your data, that’s only a 1% discrepancy. I’ve seen much larger discrepancies when weighing myself at home (using my Withings) vs. hotel scales. I’ve found that where you stand on the scale can affect things. However, you should look into bodyfat measurements on these scales – they simply awful! There are too many variables at play – did you just wake up, are your feet wet or sweaty, etc. I’m at about 11% bodyfat (using calipers) but my scale can read anywhere from 17%-20%!

  4. Can't Believe It says:

    Don’t try to keep track of ounces. Humans are much more variable than that.

Speak Your Mind

*