Supreme Court Hears Warrantless GPS Tracking Case

GPS

GPS

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could determine if police need a warrant to track a suspect’s car with GPS. The use of warrantless GPS may amount to an unreasonable search and a violation of the fourth amendment. The Obama administration appealed to the courts, saying it’s a necessary tool of law enforcement. Read the full article at Reuters.com

Author:

Shelly Palmer

Shelly Palmer is Fox 5 New York's On-air Tech Expert (WNYW-TV) and the host of Fox Television's monthly show Shelly Palmer Digital Living. He also hosts United Stations Radio Network's, Shelly Palmer Digital Living Daily, a daily syndicated radio report that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and a member of the Executive Committee of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards).

  • Hollywood5459

    The ramifications of these rulings can go far beyond using a devise. 

  • Peter Levy

    Getting a court order for a prolonged surveillance doesn’t seem to be a hinderance for the police, as long as there is probable cause.  What I find interesting in the article is that instead of saying “the Justice Dept.” or “the U.S. Attorney General,” Reuters says “OBAMA ADMINISTRATION APPEALS TO SUPREME COURT”  That appears to be editorializing.